Car Donation

May

Posted by kris Comments (0)

Rebecca Hilton asked:

The war between copy-protection and the protection and piracy PiracyCopy? forever fighting that conflict. When a new technology? Introduced in protected counterparts and seek? the sword corresponds to it. Without a very long time, this new? of? of technology? of the so-called? ? of? pu? be cracked. ? a truth? in the world. ? ridiculous to say that a product? ? of? of the able? of the UN-crack? of? of?, why? we know everything in the world can be reversed, but the only problem? efficiency and time. If we had a powerful computer (? Only an assumption) and we were pretty clever (if we were lucky), then split the entire procedure. Perhaps you think that our assumption is not realistic, but we should be serious on this subject. Because? this war is taking ever, no fighting will stop? to fight, we should explain this subject for a scientific and realistic. First, we can say that there '? any software? completed the? of the able? of the UN-crack? of? of?. We have explained before this subject. Second, software developers or vendors, the only operation that can be done? to improve the copy-protection software and make it more? difficult. Ci? a balance between protection and software piracy. If the cost to tear it ignores (or too large) the cost of software, defend such software becomes a meaningless job, nobody would crack most. Thirdly, from the point of view? of? the developers? software, what really are doing is not protecting the software, the real purpose? to achieve the maximum profit. To keep the maximum profit from the software? Most business and the only reason why the guide developers to protect software. If we are considering the subject from this side, we can say? of? of protection? Copy? of? of? ? just a side effect that led through the commercial purpose. In the next installment, we will present the details of the protection of software. Part 2. A description on the copy ProtectionHere software, we can discuss some technical copy-protection software. The general purpose of copy-protection software? to prevent unauthorized use of software. What? All we can say that the method or action to prevent unauthorized use of software? copy-protection software. We can classify the copy-protection software in 3 main types. What first? ? of? based of? software? of? of?. This method of protection? pure software-based and non c '? no additional meta needed. The members in this type are typical serial number, Packer software (also known as hedging or enveloper). The numberEnd-series users can use the software only or the full function of the software if and only if the user has a correct serial number (or reasonable). The advantage of such protection? what? easy and cheap. While this split is not protected? a difficult job for a professional reprogramme. If you find the authentication code in the file, then we can reverse it and make a cracker against General it.PackersPacking software? a very common method for protecting software. ? easy and without any additional programming work. Developers need only click a lot of simple, so the advantage of theThe of pure software-based security? cost. In general? inexpensive relative. While, on the one hand, the disadvantage? easy to see, or we can say that the disadvantage? Clearly, what? easy to be cracked. We have said before, no? UN-crack in a position, if we let all the protection on the side of the end users, open us all to reprogramming, which can find the meaning defend your protection eventually. ————————————————– ————————————————– —————–|? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Good? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Bad? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |————————————————- ————————————————– ——————-| 1st easy? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 1. easy to crack? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | | 2. cheap? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 2. control? weak? ? ? of? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | |? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 3. easy for piracy? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |————————————————- ————————————————– ——————- The second method of protection? ? online? of License? of? of? of?. You can find this kind of protection from everywhere, such as the? online? Activation of? of? of? of? Windows Xp and the pro? Engineering? ? this kind of protection needs of an assistant, who holds the database for authorization / activation keys. Porter? a central control for authorization. You need a start / initial estimate of fees for approval in line as it? an additional assistant? necessary, you also good that you can share with other assistant. Compared with the protection? of? software-based? of? of? of ', the? online? the license? of? of? of? ? better. You can enjoy the convenience of the schemes and better security. The cost? a po'p? high and the beginning / start investing? a must. This protection? Good for large software vendors, who sell copies of lle pi? 5000 a year and thousands are in need of an approximate control of the authorization. ————————————————– ————————————————– —————–|? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Good? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Bad? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |————————————————- ————————————————– ——————-| 1st easy? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 1. easy to crack? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | | 2. cost? Low on? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 2. schemes? drive? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | | 3. the centralized control? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? of? | 3. high cost? initial relative? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |————————————————- ————————————————– L ——————- 's kind of security software? ? of? the Dongle? software? of? of ", or call the security-based, protection-based dongle, the dongle for copy-protection software, etc.. This kind of protection would be the best and can maximum income of? of? the vendors? software. Pu? a UN-dongle crack of the software? The answer must be NO, but why? it? the best? ? just because? it can maximum income of? of? the vendors? software. Okay, now we have twice repeated the same sentence, just to emphasis this point. Let me explain it in detail. First, why? we need the protection of software? Just for anti-piracy? No, not anti-piracy? the real reason or the root, the real purpose? profit. We want to make money from software, but software can not robbed? bring us some benefits, so we need the anti-piracy. Now, leave back to the protection of software, the real objective of the protection of software? to protect profits. Pu? a maximum of dongle software income? How? To explain this behavior, we must explain how we sell the software. Today, we sell the software via our distributors or direct sale on the Internet. We can call the sales channel. The client software directly? the groove of sales. In fact, we do not know how the software? been sold, what the price for each copy. Just collect the money from this channel and we see the number? correct with what dictate. If without a dongle, do not the specific number, we know just who are selling this software, but killing loss when the front of the number of copies, we can not control the copy of the authorization. In this sense, the first use of a dongle software? to obtain the number. Si pu? say, if the software? robbed to end-user side, the software vendor will not get? nothing too. Good question, but think for a supplier's point of view of software, we should not and can not leave the piracy disappear from the earth. The elasticit? Software robbed just so that a good place? software providers grow the market. For a software vendor, especially a provider of CAD / CAM / CAE, who? your customer, a business / institution / university? or just a student / developer poor? The answer? too simple. The real score? people who can? or can buy? buy the software, what? the entities? that allows this software. People who can not? afford the software? only potential customer, who can not? buy the software now. This is the kind of people might buy your software in the future if they feel good, but not now? the right time. If you want to cultivate the market, let us use the copy is not robbed? a bad choice. Remember? of? of? words to make money from people who can? do? of? of money?. In conclusion, we should make a clear point, if we can make money from people who can? make money, this point we're more than our profit. The dongles software can help them implement the various schemes of protection of software. Discuss this subject in the following chapter. Now, let me summarize the dongles software. ————————————————– ——————————————–

Content

Categories: Security

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Leave a Reply

Blog

mafia games

offshore

Tags Cloud

Archives